In a closely contested matchup, the Alabama Crimson Tide (NET #20) emerged victorious on the road, defeating the Louisiana State Tigers (NET #66) 90-83. The final margin of 7 points belied the intensity of the game, as both teams traded baskets throughout the evening. At halftime, the Crimson Tide held a narrow 43-40 advantage, but it was the Tigers who came out strong in the second half, taking a 43-40 lead. However, the Crimson Tide were able to regain control and ultimately secure the win.
The statistics paint a picture of a game that could have gone either way. Alabama outscored LSU by 7 points in the second half, but the Tigers still managed to outpace the Crimson Tide in the paint and on the glass. The game was decided by a possession or two, with both teams struggling to maintain a consistent pace throughout the evening. In the end, it was the Crimson Tide's ability to capitalize on their scoring opportunities that proved to be the difference.
Alabama's backcourt duo of Aden Holloway and Amari Allen played pivotal roles in the Crimson Tide's 90-83 victory over LSU. Holloway led the team in scoring with 17 points, shooting efficiently from the free throw line where he went 6-for-6. He also contributed with 4 assists, but struggled from beyond the arc, making just 1 of his 6 three-point attempts. Allen chipped in with 16 points, grabbing 6 rebounds and making 2 three-pointers in the process, showcasing his all-around capabilities.
Latrell Wrightsell provided a spark off the bench with 14 points, but his efficiency was somewhat inconsistent. He made just 2 of his 8 field goal attempts and 1 of his 5 three-point attempts, but was a perfect 9-for-10 from the free throw line, helping to bolster Alabama's scoring margin. Wrightsell's contributions, though not always efficient, were crucial in Alabama's win, as the team's offense was able to overcome some struggles from the perimeter to secure the victory.
Marquel Sutton's 21 points were a bright spot for LSU, as he demonstrated a consistent ability to score from various spots on the court. However, his 6 turnovers and 4 fouls limited his overall impact, preventing him from making a more significant difference in the game's outcome. His 7-16 shooting from the field and 6-8 from the free throw line were respectable, but ultimately not enough to propel the Tigers to victory.
Jalen Reece's 14 points were a solid contribution, but he was somewhat stifled by his lack of rebounding, managing just one board. His 5 assists were a positive, but his inability to capitalize on scoring opportunities, going 5-10 from the field and 1-4 from three-point range, left him falling short of what was needed to push the Tigers to a win.
Pablo Tamba's breakout performance was a significant departure from his season average, as he not only eclipsed his scoring and rebounding averages but also demonstrated a marked increase in efficiency, converting 5 of his 6 field goal attempts. His improved shooting and rebounding prowess were complemented by a modest uptick in assists, suggesting a more well-rounded contribution to the LSU offense. This performance suggests that Tamba's growth and development are trending in a positive direction, and he may be emerging as a more integral part of the Tigers' rotation.
CHD Scout Report Card
CORRECTPredicted
Final
The pre-game prediction of an Alabama victory by 7.8 points ultimately proved correct, with the Crimson Tide emerging victorious by a margin of 7 points. This outcome was not a surprise, given the team's overall performance and the key factors that contributed to their success.
The decisive difference in the game was the Alabama team's ability to maintain its season-long edge in effective field goal percentage (eFG%). The Crimson Tide's 51.7% eFG% in this contest was a testament to their efficient shooting and ability to capitalize on scoring opportunities. Additionally, Alabama's opponents, LSU, struggled from beyond the arc, converting at a season-low 45.0% clip. This was a stark contrast to the Tigers' season average of 32.8%, and it significantly impacted their ability to keep pace with the Crimson Tide. Meanwhile, LSU's dominance on the glass, particularly on the offensive end, was not enough to compensate for their shooting woes, as Alabama's OREB rate of 32.3% was actually slightly higher than the Tigers' 40.0% mark.
The Crimson Tide's victory marks a significant turning point in Alabama's NCAA Tournament resume, as it now boasts a 6-6 record against Quad 1 opponents, a crucial metric in the selection committee's evaluation. This win, combined with its strong NET ranking, will likely secure Alabama a double-digit seed in the tournament, potentially as high as an 8 or 9 seed. In contrast, LSU's loss drops it to 1-9 against Quad 1 opponents, a stark contrast to its 2-1 record against weaker foes. This disparity will make it increasingly difficult for the Tigers to secure a top-10 seed, and may even put their tournament bid in jeopardy. Alabama's win has effectively separated the two teams, with the Crimson Tide now in position to make a serious push for a top-8 seed.