In a closely contested matchup, Baylor University, ranked 49th in the NET, emerged victorious over Arizona State University, ranked 67th, with a 73-68 final score. The margin of victory was five points, a result that belied the intensity of the game. The Sun Devils had a strong first half, outscoring the Bears 40-32, but ultimately fell short in the second half, where Baylor outscored them 41-28.
The game was a tale of two halves, with each team asserting its dominance in its respective stanza. While the Sun Devils' strong start suggested a competitive contest, Baylor's second-half surge ultimately proved decisive. The Bears' ability to outscore their opponents in the second half, combined with their defense holding the Sun Devils to 28 points, was the key factor in their five-point victory.
Obi Agbim's 16-point effort was a key factor in Baylor's victory, as he shot efficiently from the field, converting 6 of his 8 field goal attempts and 4 of his 6 three-point tries. His 5 rebounds and 2 assists also contributed to the team's overall performance. While his three-point shooting was a highlight, it was his ability to score from the field that made him a valuable asset in the paint.
Tounde Yessoufou and Isaac Williams IV also played crucial roles in Baylor's win. Yessoufou's 16 points came at a cost, however, as he struggled from the free throw line, making just 2 of his 7 attempts. His 6 of 14 field goal attempts and 2 of 7 three-point tries were not as efficient as Agbim's shooting. Meanwhile, Williams IV's 14 points were backed by 5 assists, but he struggled to contribute on the glass, grabbing only 1 rebound.
Anthony Johnson's performance was a highlight for Arizona State, as he led the team in scoring with 20 points. His efficiency from the free throw line was impressive, converting 8 of 10 attempts, but he struggled from beyond the arc, making only 0 of 2 three-point attempts. Despite this, Johnson's ability to score in the paint and from the line kept Arizona State in contention. However, it was not enough to overcome Baylor's balanced attack.
Maurice Odum had a respectable game, but his shooting percentages were uncharacteristically low. He made only 4 of 11 field goal attempts and 3 of 9 three-point attempts, which limited his overall impact on the game. Massamba Diop's double-double was a bright spot for the Sun Devils, but he was largely quiet in terms of scoring, with only 10 points. Diop's defensive presence was evident, however, as he recorded 10 rebounds and blocked a shot.
The remaining members of both rosters generally stuck to their established roles, with few deviations from their season averages.
CHD Scout Report Card
CORRECTPredicted
Final
The pre-game prediction of a Baylor victory by 3.2 points proved to be accurate, with the Bears ultimately prevailing by 5 points. While the margin of victory was wider than anticipated, the outcome was consistent with expectations.
A closer examination of the in-game statistics reveals that Baylor's exceptional shooting efficiency was a decisive factor. The Bears' effective field goal percentage soared to 65.7%, more than 12 percentage points above their season average, indicating a breakout performance from the team's offense. Meanwhile, Arizona State's 3-point shooting, a key area of concern, failed to materialize, as the Sun Devils converted at just 30% from beyond the arc, a full 4 percentage points below their season average. Additionally, Baylor's ability to secure second-chance opportunities through rebounding, with an in-game OREB rate of 19.2%, also played a significant role in their victory, as they outrebounded Arizona State by a significant margin.
The outcome of this matchup has significant implications for both teams' NCAA Tournament resumes. For Baylor, the victory against a Quad 1 opponent bolsters their profile, particularly in the NET rankings, where they now sit at #49. This win will likely secure a top 10 seed in the tournament, assuming they can maintain their current NET position. On the other hand, Arizona State's loss to a Quad 2 opponent, despite their own Quad 1 win count, has slightly diminished their profile. Their NET ranking remains steady, but their Quad 2 loss will make it challenging for them to secure a seeding above a 10 or 11. With both teams now tied at 14-13, the margin between a likely 10-seed and a potentially 15-seed bid is razor-thin, and a single loss could prove costly in the selection committee's deliberations. The real question is, can Arizona State afford another misstep?