The Illinois State Redbirds pulled off a stunning upset at CEFCU Arena, defeating the Belmont Bruins 81-74. The seven-point margin of victory belies the significance of this result, as Illinois State, ranked 94th in the NET rankings, took down a Belmont team that sits 42 spots higher at 52nd. The first half saw Belmont edge ahead, 40-38, but Illinois State's strong second-half performance, outscoring their opponents 43-34, ultimately proved decisive.
The implications of this upset are substantial, particularly in terms of seed line projections. Illinois State's victory will likely send shockwaves through the bracket, potentially altering the trajectory of both teams' postseason aspirations. A closer examination of the team statistics reveals a nuanced story behind the Redbirds' upset win, with Illinois State leveraging their strengths to overcome the favored Bruins. As the dust settles on this surprising result, a deeper dive into the performances of key contributors will be necessary to fully understand the dynamics at play.
A 29-point effort was not to be found, but the next best thing was the collective performance of Illinois State's top players. With the game on the line, the team relied on its balanced attack, led by Johnny Kinziger, whose 16 points, 3 rebounds, and 6 assists helped guide Illinois State to victory. His ability to distribute the ball and score when necessary was crucial, as evidenced by his 6 assists and 16 points on 5-14 shooting from the field.
Erupting for a significant scoring output was not necessary for Boden Skunberg, as his 15 points on efficient 4-7 shooting from the field, including 4-6 from three-point range, provided a spark for Illinois State. The freshman standout, Ty Pence, chipped in with 14 points, 4 rebounds, and 1 block, offering a glimpse of his all-around skills, while also shooting 4-6 from the field and 5-6 from the free-throw line. His contributions, along with those of Kinziger and Skunberg, proved to be the difference in the 81-74 win.
Finishing with 17 points, Lundblade's shooting from beyond the arc was a notable aspect of his performance, as he made 5 of 11 three-point attempts. Despite the loss, his 17 points on 6-16 shooting from the field were a significant contribution to Belmont's offense. The team's leading scorer, however, was ultimately unable to overcome the deficit, as his efforts were not enough to keep pace with Illinois State.
His 14 points and 6 rebounds made Jenkins a well-rounded contributor for Belmont, with 3 assists also showcasing his ability to create for his teammates. With 11 points, Smiley's output was also a notable aspect of the game, as he finished with 4 assists and made 3 of 5 three-point attempts, but like his teammates, his performance was not quite enough to secure a win for Belmont.
The remainder of the players on both teams generally fell in line with their seasonal averages, without any notable deviations.
CHD Scout Report Card
INCORRECTPredicted
Final
The pre-game prediction, which favored Belmont by 6.6 points, proved to be inaccurate as Illinois State emerged victorious by 7 points. This discrepancy highlights the unpredictability of college basketball, where teams can defy expectations on any given night. In this case, Illinois State's performance deviated from the predicted outcome, suggesting that the team was able to capitalize on certain aspects of the game that were not fully accounted for in the pre-game forecast.
A closer examination of the team statistics reveals that Illinois State's ability to secure offensive rebounds and shoot efficiently from beyond the arc were crucial factors in their victory. The team's offensive rebounding rate of 37.0% exceeded their season average, indicating a heightened level of aggression and determination on the glass. Furthermore, their 3-point shooting percentage of 44.4% was significantly higher than their season average, suggesting that they were able to find open looks and convert them at a high rate. These factors, combined with their overall efficient shooting, as evidenced by an eFG% of 58.5%, ultimately contributed to Illinois State's ability to outscore Belmont and secure the win.
The outcome of this game has significant implications for both teams' postseason prospects, albeit in different ways. For Illinois State, the victory keeps their slim hopes of a conference tournament auto-bid alive, but it does little to alter their overall trajectory, as their only path to the NCAA Tournament remains winning the MVC tournament. In contrast, Belmont's loss may have a more pronounced impact on their at-large chances, as a Quad 2 defeat could potentially drop them down the seeding lines, particularly given their lack of Quad 1 opportunities to bolster their resume. While Belmont's overall profile remains relatively strong, this loss may force them to lean more heavily on their conference tournament performance to solidify their position on the bubble, and ultimately, their inability to capitalize on this Quad 2 opportunity may prove to be a costly misstep in their pursuit of an at-large bid.