The Drake Bulldogs, ranked 209 in the NET rankings, secured a convincing 100-79 victory over the Belmont Bruins, ranked 55, at the Enterprise Center. The 21-point margin of victory underscored the dominance of the winning team, with Drake outscoring Belmont in both halves. The first half saw Drake take a 48-41 lead, which they built upon in the second half, outscoring Belmont 52-38.
The final score reflects a notable upset, given the significant disparity in NET rankings between the two teams. Despite being the lower-ranked team, Drake's performance was exceptional, with one player standing out in particular. This standout effort was a key factor in the outcome, and a closer examination of the box score reveals a stat line that far exceeds season averages, highlighting the extraordinary nature of this individual's contribution to the game.
A 31-point, 3-rebound performance from Jalen Quinn set the tone for Drake, as his ability to score from various spots on the court proved difficult for Belmont to contain. His 13-16 mark from the free throw line was particularly notable, showcasing Quinn's ability to draw contact and capitalize on scoring opportunities. With Owen Larson also making significant contributions, the Bulldogs' offense was able to maintain a high level of efficiency throughout the game. Larson's 8 rebounds and 8 assists complemented his 25 points, demonstrating his well-rounded skillset.
The freshman standout Owen Larson's impressive stat line was matched by his overall impact on the game, as his 4-7 mark from three-point range helped stretch the defense and create scoring opportunities for his teammates. Erupting for 25 points, Larson's performance was a key factor in Drake's 100-79 victory. In support of Quinn and Larson, Jaehshon Thomas's 13 points on 5-8 shooting provided a secondary scoring punch, with his 2 assists and 3 rebounds also contributing to the team's overall effort.
Finishing with 19 points, including 5-8 from beyond the arc, Aidan Noyes' shooting was a notable aspect of Belmont's offense, but ultimately not enough to overcome the deficit. His 4-4 mark from the free throw line also showcased his ability to capitalize on opportunities at the line. Despite the loss, Sam Orme's 18 points on 7-11 shooting, including 4-5 from three-point range, demonstrated his scoring prowess, though it was not sufficient to propel Belmont to victory.
The team's leading scorer, aside from Noyes, was Sam Orme, whose two assists also highlighted a secondary facet of his game, as he attempted to facilitate for his teammates. His two rebounds, however, were a relatively modest contribution on the glass. With 11 points, 5 assists, and 3 rebounds, Tyler Lundblade's overall performance was somewhat subdued, as he was limited to 4-11 shooting from the field, including 3-10 from three-point range, and was unable to provide the necessary spark to ignite a Belmont comeback.
A notable deviation from season averages was seen in the performance of Brigham Rogers, whose 6 points, 1 rebound, and 2 assists were somewhat offset by an unusually strong defensive showing, with 3 blocks exceeding his average by 2.4 per game, while his scoring and rebounding fell short of expectations, with his points per game and rebounds per game coming in 0.7 and 2.6 below his respective season averages.
CHD Scout Report Card
INCORRECTPredicted
Final
The pre-game prediction, which heavily favored Belmont by 21 points, proved to be grossly inaccurate as Drake emerged victorious by the same margin. This outcome was a significant departure from the expected result, highlighting the unpredictability of the game. The discrepancy between the predicted and actual outcomes suggests that there were key factors at play that were not adequately accounted for in the pre-game assessment.
A closer examination of the team statistics reveals that Drake's exceptional shooting efficiency was a crucial factor in their victory. The team's effective field goal percentage of 67.6% was substantially higher than their season average, indicating a highly effective offense. Additionally, Drake's ability to limit Belmont's usually potent offense, which shot 8.9% below their season average in terms of effective field goal percentage, was also a significant factor. These two factors combined to give Drake a decisive edge, allowing them to secure a convincing win despite being predicted to lose by a wide margin.
The outcome of this game has significant implications for both teams' postseason aspirations. For Drake, the victory is a morale boost, but it does little to alter their reality - their only path to the NCAA Tournament remains winning the Missouri Valley Conference tournament. In contrast, Belmont's loss, albeit in a Quad 4 game, may raise some eyebrows among the selection committee, potentially impacting their seeding if they were to receive an at-large bid. With a NET ranking of 55 and a 5-2 record against Quad 2 opponents, Belmont still holds a reasonable position on the bubble, but this loss may have trimmed their margin for error. Ultimately, the result serves as a reminder that for teams on the bubble, even Quad 4 losses can have a profound impact on their postseason fate, and Belmont's inability to win this game will only intensify the scrutiny on their remaining schedule.