Hofstra emerged victorious from a closely contested matchup at Cabot Center, defeating Northeastern by a 14-point margin, 82-68. The Pride outpaced the Huskies in the first half, 39-30, and maintained their lead through the second half, ultimately closing out the game with a 43-38 advantage. The outcome suggests that Hofstra's higher NET ranking, at #98, may have been a factor in their success.
While the 14-point margin might suggest a more decisive victory, the fact that Northeastern was able to outscore Hofstra by 8 points in the second half indicates that the Huskies remained competitive until the end. The final margin ultimately came down to a few key possessions, with Hofstra's offense and defense proving more effective in the end.
Cruz Davis's 22 points led the Pride, as he shot efficiently from the field, converting 46.7% of his attempts. He also showed a reliable touch from beyond the arc, making 28.6% of his three-pointers. Davis's well-rounded game was capped off by a strong showing at the free throw line, where he made 85.7% of his attempts. His 3 assists also contributed to the team's offense, as he demonstrated an ability to facilitate the pace of the game.
Preston Edmead and German Plotnikov also played significant roles in Hofstra's victory. Edmead's 19 points were complemented by a strong all-around performance, including 5 rebounds and 5 assists. His shooting percentages from the field and three-point line were respectable, with 50% and 42.9% marks, respectively. Plotnikov, meanwhile, chipped in with 18 points, shooting 54.5% from the field and 42.9% from beyond the arc. His efficient shooting and rebounding made him a valuable contributor to the Pride's offense.
William Kermoury's 17 points were a bright spot for Northeastern, but his inability to find consistent shooting rhythm hindered the team's overall offense. His 4-10 mark from the field and 3-7 showing from three-point range were not enough to make a significant impact on the game's outcome.
Youri Fritz's well-rounded performance, which included 14 points, 11 rebounds, and 3 assists, was ultimately overshadowed by Hofstra's dominant effort. Fritz's 6-11 shooting from the field was a mixed bag, with his 2-4 mark from the free throw line being a notable area of concern. Petar Pinter's 12 points, while respectable, were largely offset by his limited contributions on the glass and defensively, where he was held to just one block.
Victory Onuetu's performance was a stark departure from his typical output, as he was significantly outrebounded and failed to produce on the defensive end, with a noticeable drop in blocks per game. Conversely, Xavier Abreu's outing was marked by an uncharacteristic shooting slump, as he converted at just 36% from the field and 0% from three-point range, yet he still managed to post a double-double, underscoring his value as a rebounder and distributor, and suggesting that his scoring struggles may be somewhat mitigated by other facets of his game.
CHD Scout Report Card
CORRECTPredicted
Final
The pre-game prediction of a 13.1-point Hofstra victory proved to be accurate, as the Pride emerged with a 14-point win. While it may seem like a close margin, the actual outcome was a reflection of the clear disparity in team performance.
A closer examination of the game reveals that Hofstra's superior shooting efficiency, particularly in the half court, played a significant role in the outcome. The Pride's 62.0% effective field goal percentage (eFG%) was a testament to their ability to score at will, with Northeastern struggling to keep pace at 46.2%. Additionally, Hofstra's strong three-point shooting (42.3%) also made it difficult for the Huskies to stay within striking distance, as Northeastern's three-point defense was not up to par, converting at just 26.1% from beyond the arc.
The win for Hofstra bolsters its NCAA Tournament resume, particularly in the NET rankings, where it now sits at #98. Although the game was classified as a Quad 4 contest, the victory will likely contribute positively to Hofstra's profile. With a 19-10 record and a respectable 2-3 split in Quad 1 and 2 games, Hofstra is solidifying its position as a strong candidate for a low-to-mid-major tournament bid. In contrast, Northeastern's loss will further damage its already struggling resume, with a 6-20 record and a 0-4 record in Quad 2 games, making it an uphill battle for the Huskies to secure an at-large invitation.
This win could potentially secure Hofstra a 12-seed in the tournament, while Northeastern's chances of making the field are all but over, a stark reminder that one game can be the difference between postseason relevance and the long offseason that awaits.