In a matchup of two top-25 teams, the University of Wisconsin, Badgers, pulled away from the University of Iowa, Hawkeyes, for an 84-71 victory at the Kohl Center. The Badgers' 13-point margin of victory belied a closely contested first half, in which the Hawkeyes actually held a narrow lead. However, Wisconsin's offense proved too potent in the second half, outscoring Iowa 44-30 to seal the win.
The final scoreline suggests that Wisconsin's strong second-half performance was the decisive factor, but it's also possible that a few key possessions swung the game in the Badgers' favor. The Badgers' NET ranking of 34 was slightly lower than Iowa's NET ranking of 25, but they were able to make the most of their opportunities on both ends of the court.
A 29-point, 10-rebound performance from Nick Boyd set the tone for Wisconsin, as the sophomore forward's well-rounded effort helped the Badgers secure a decisive 84-71 victory over Iowa. His 10 assists were a testament to his ability to distribute the ball effectively, as the Wisconsin offense clicked into high gear with Boyd at the helm.
Erupting for 18 points, Nolan Winter provided a reliable scoring option for the Badgers, shooting 8-of-11 from the field and 2-of-3 from beyond the arc. Meanwhile, Austin Rapp's 14 points, all of which came from the field or three-point range, served as a timely boost to Wisconsin's offense, particularly during stretches where the Badgers were able to pull away from Iowa.
Bennett Stirtz's 23 points on 9-16 shooting from the field and 3-8 from beyond the arc were the bright spots for Iowa, but ultimately, they weren't enough to keep the team in the game. His two assists were a small bright spot in a game where the Hawkeyes struggled to move the ball effectively.
Despite the loss, Tate Sage managed to put together a solid all-around performance, finishing with 11 points, seven rebounds, and a block. Alvaro Folgueiras also had a respectable outing, scoring 11 points and grabbing six rebounds while adding four assists. However, the trio's collective effort was not enough to overcome Wisconsin's balanced attack.
The remainder of the rosters for both teams largely adhered to their established statistical profiles, with no significant deviations from their season averages.
CHD Scout Report Card
CORRECTPredicted
Final
The pre-game prediction of a 2.2-point Wisconsin victory proved to be remarkably accurate, with the Badgers ultimately claiming a 13-point win. While this outcome may seem like a landslide, the disparity in final scores belies a game that was competitive for a significant stretch. Wisconsin's surge to a 13-point victory can be attributed in large part to its uncharacteristic shooting efficiency from both within and beyond the three-point line.
Wisconsin's shooting prowess, particularly its 41.7% three-point clip, was a key factor in its decisive win. This marked a significant uptick from its season average, and it allowed the Badgers to create separation from the Hawkeyes. Meanwhile, Iowa's inability to capitalize on its own opportunities on the glass, where it typically excels, also contributed to its downfall. The Badgers' ability to limit Iowa's second-chance opportunities and capitalize on their own rebounding chances proved to be a decisive factor in the game's outcome.
Wisconsin's victory in this Quad 1 matchup has likely solidified their position on the NCAA Tournament bubble, and this win could provide a much-needed boost to their NET ranking. With five Quad 1 wins, Wisconsin has positioned themselves for a potential at-large bid, and a top seed in the Big Ten Tournament would only strengthen their resume. As a result, the Badgers could potentially move up the NET rankings and into the top 25, making them a more formidable at-large contender. If Wisconsin were to secure a top seed in the conference tournament, their Quad 1 wins would give them a strong argument for a 5 or 6 seed in the NCAA Tournament. Wisconsin's Quad 1 wins will now be crucial in determining their seeding and overall tournament position.
For Iowa, this loss in a Quad 1 game has put a dent in their postseason aspirations, and they now find themselves in a precarious position on the bubble. With only three Quad 1 wins, Iowa's NET ranking may take a hit, and they may struggle to hold onto their projected at-large bid. Iowa's remaining schedule is crucial in determining their tournament fate, and they will need to pick up more Quad 1 wins to solidify their position. As a projected at-large team, Iowa's seeding and overall tournament position are now more uncertain than ever. With one loss already on their resume, Iowa's NCAA Tournament hopes now hang in the balance - a single misstep in the conference tournament could prove disastrous.