In a contest that ultimately came down to a handful of possessions, Colgate University emerged victorious over Loyola University Maryland, securing a 90-77 win at Cotterell Court. The final margin of 13 points belies the competitive nature of the game, as Colgate held a slim seven-point advantage at the break. The Raiders' ability to maintain and build upon this lead proved decisive, outscoring Loyola Maryland by six points in the second half to seal the victory.
A closer examination of the half scores reveals that Colgate's edge was consistent, if not overwhelming, throughout the contest. The Raiders' seven-point halftime lead, built on a 46-39 advantage, was supplemented by a 44-38 edge in the second half. While Loyola Maryland remained within striking distance for much of the game, Colgate's overall performance was sufficient to earn a 13-point win, a margin that reflects the subtle distinctions between these two teams, with Colgate ranked 228 in the NET rankings and Loyola Maryland at 328.
A 28-point performance from Ben Tweedy, coupled with 5 rebounds and 2 assists, helped propel Colgate to victory. His 9-12 shooting from the field, including 5-8 from three-point range, proved particularly effective in stretching the defense. With 21 points, 5 rebounds, and 11 assists, Jalen Cox demonstrated his versatility, making 7 of 11 field goals and all 7 of his free throw attempts.
The freshman standout, Andrew Alekseyenko, chipped in with 17 points, 5 rebounds, and 2 assists, as Colgate's balanced attack proved too much for Loyola Maryland to handle. Erupting for 7-14 shooting from the field, Alekseyenko's presence in the paint was a key factor in Colgate's success. As the game unfolded, Tweedy's outside shooting and Cox's playmaking ability continued to pose problems for the Loyola Maryland defense, ultimately contributing to the 90-77 win.
Finishing with 19 points from Braeden Speed wasn't enough to keep Loyola Maryland in it, as his 7-14 shooting from the field and 8 assists were offset by the team's overall struggles. His 3-6 mark from beyond the arc was a notable bright spot, but ultimately, the team's leading scorer needed more help from his supporting cast. The team's second-leading scorer, Jordan Stiemke, had a solid outing, with 17 points on 6-11 shooting, but his lack of assists and limited rebounding impact hindered the team's ability to keep pace.
Despite the loss, Emmett Adair's 16 points on 6-14 shooting were a respectable effort, and his 4 rebounds were a team-high among the top performers. However, his 0-5 mark from three-point range was a disappointment, and the team's inability to get him going from beyond the arc limited their overall scoring potential. With Speed's 2 rebounds and Stiemke's 2 rebounds, the team's top performers were shut down on the glass, allowing Colgate to control the tempo and secure the win.
Beyond the standout performances highlighted earlier, the remainder of the players on both teams generally stayed within their established season averages.
CHD Scout Report Card
CORRECTPredicted
Final
The pre-game prediction of a Colgate victory by 7.3 points ultimately proved correct, albeit with a wider margin of victory than anticipated. The actual result, a 13-point win for Colgate, suggests that the Raiders' performance exceeded expectations, while Loyola Maryland struggled to keep pace. This disparity in outcome is notable, given that the prediction was broadly correct in terms of the winner, but underestimated the extent of Colgate's dominance.
A closer examination of the team statistics reveals that Colgate's exceptional shooting and rebounding efforts were key factors in deciding the game's outcome. The Raiders' significantly elevated effective field goal percentage and three-point shooting percentage indicate a high level of accuracy and efficiency on offense, which put considerable pressure on Loyola Maryland's defense. Furthermore, Colgate's substantial increase in offensive rebounding rate allowed them to capitalize on scoring opportunities and limit Loyola Maryland's chances, ultimately contributing to the decisive margin of victory.
The result significantly impacts the postseason positioning for both teams, as they are now jockeying for position in the Patriot League tournament. Colgate's win improves their standing, bolstering their chances of securing a favorable seed in the conference tournament, while Loyola Maryland's loss further complicates their path to the auto-bid. Given their respective NET rankings, neither team has an advantage in terms of overall strength, but Colgate's ability to win a Quad 4 game against a Quad 3 opponent for Loyola Maryland suggests they may have an edge in the conference pecking order. As the Patriot League tournament approaches, Colgate's program trajectory appears more stable, having navigated a challenging schedule, whereas Loyola Maryland's inconsistency raises concerns about their ability to make a deep run. Ultimately, this loss may be a crippling blow to Loyola Maryland's already slim hopes of winning the conference tournament, and it's likely that their season will be defined by what could have been.