The University of Arkansas Razorbacks outlasted the University of Missouri Tigers 94-86 at Bud Walton Arena, handing the Tigers an eight-point defeat. The Razorbacks' 47-41 lead at halftime set the stage for a closely contested second half, which ultimately saw Arkansas pull away to secure a crucial conference victory. The Razorbacks' success was not a surprise, given their 18th-ranked NET ranking, but the Tigers' competitiveness was a testament to their own growing program.
In the end, Arkansas's superior talent and cohesion proved decisive, as the Razorbacks were able to outscore Missouri 47-45 in the second half to seal the win. The Tigers' own NET ranking of 59 reflected their struggles against a more established opponent, but they showed flashes of brilliance that bode well for their future prospects.
Billy Richmond III's performance was a highlight for Arkansas, as he led the team in scoring with 21 points. His efficiency from the field was notable, converting 9 of 14 field goal attempts and 2 of 3 three-pointers. Richmond also showed his defensive capabilities, registering 2 blocks. While his rebounding and passing numbers were limited, his scoring output was a key factor in Arkansas' victory.
Darius Acuff Jr. and Malique Ewin also made significant contributions to the Razorbacks' win. Acuff Jr. was effective from the free throw line, making 11 of 13 attempts, and his 5 assists helped facilitate Arkansas' offense. Ewin's rebounding presence was a key factor, as he grabbed 8 boards to help secure Arkansas' position in the paint. His 16 points also came in handy for the Razorbacks, as they ultimately secured a 94-86 victory.
Mark Mitchell's performance was a mixed bag, as he managed to dominate the scoring column with 26 points, but his supporting numbers were somewhat lacking. His 4 rebounds and 8 assists were not particularly impressive given his usage, and his shooting splits, while efficient, did not stand out as exceptional. Despite this, his ability to score at will kept Missouri in the game, even if it ultimately proved not enough to secure a victory.
Trent Pierce had a solid outing, putting up 22 points on 60% shooting, including a respectable 3-7 from beyond the arc. However, his inability to contribute in other areas - he had zero assists and was outrebounded by his opponents - limited his overall impact on the game. Meanwhile, Shawn Phillips Jr. struggled to make a significant impact, managing only 11 points and 4 rebounds, and was largely shut down by Arkansas' defense.
Meleek Thomas's performance in this matchup deviated significantly from his season averages, particularly in the rebounding department where he more than doubled his average, hauling in 8 rebounds to his season average of 3.9. While his scoring dipped slightly below his average, his increased rebounding and additional block contribute to a well-rounded effort that went beyond his typical output. Conversely, Trevon Brazile's performance fell short of expectations in terms of scoring and rebounding, with his 12 points and 5 rebounds representing a decrease from his season averages. However, his 6 assists were a notable increase, reflecting his ability to adapt to the game's flow and distribute the ball effectively, even if his overall production did not meet his usual standards.
CHD Scout Report Card
CORRECTPredicted
Final
While the pre-game prediction of a 12.2-point Arkansas victory proved correct, the Razorbacks ultimately pulled away from Missouri by a margin of 8 points. This outcome was a reflection of the Razorbacks' ability to capitalize on their strengths and exploit the Tigers' vulnerabilities.
The decisive factors in this game were Arkansas's improved efficiency from the field, where they shot 59.0% in this contest compared to their season average of 57.0%, and their increased 3-point shooting, which rose to 44.4% from the season average of 37.8%. These improvements allowed Arkansas to maintain a high level of scoring and sustain their lead. Additionally, the Razorbacks' dominance on the glass, particularly in terms of offensive rebounds, where they secured 37.0% of available opportunities, was a significant factor in their victory, as it allowed them to limit Missouri's second-chance scoring opportunities and maintain control of the tempo.
The outcome of this game has significant implications for both teams' NCAA Tournament resumes. For Arkansas, this Quad 2 victory strengthens its case for a top-four seed, potentially even a No. 3 seed, given its impressive 6-0 record against Quad 1 opponents and a 4-0 mark in Quad 2. Missouri's loss, on the other hand, puts its NCAA Tournament bid in jeopardy, as it now has a 4-4 record against Quad 1 opponents, a crucial metric for the committee. With its NET ranking and overall body of work, Missouri's likely to be on the bubble, but this setback significantly increases the difficulty of its path to the tournament. Arkansas's win may have sealed its fate as a tournament lock, but Missouri's postseason fate is now far from secure.