The University of North Dakota and South Dakota State University engaged in a closely contested matchup, with South Dakota State ultimately emerging victorious, 91-83. The eight-point margin of victory belies the competitive nature of the game, as North Dakota held a slim advantage at halftime, 44-42. Despite being outscored in the second half, 49-39, North Dakota remained within striking distance until the final whistle.
The disparity in the teams' NET rankings, with South Dakota State at 206 and North Dakota at 275, did not necessarily manifest in the game's outcome, as the final score suggests a closely contested affair. SDSU's ability to outpace North Dakota in the second half ultimately proved decisive, as they pulled away for the eight-point win. A deeper examination of the game's statistics will be necessary to fully understand the factors that separated these two teams.
The Jackrabbits' top performers played a crucial role in their 91-83 victory over North Dakota. Joe Sayler led the team with 23 points, shooting 6-13 from the field and 3-5 from three-point range. He also contributed 8 rebounds and 1 assist, while converting 8-9 free throws. Matthew Mors was another key contributor, scoring 18 points on 7-10 shooting from the field, including 2-3 from beyond the arc. Mors also grabbed 7 rebounds and dished out 2 assists.
Damon Wilkinson rounded out the top trio of performers for South Dakota State, posting 15 points and 5 rebounds. He shot 4-7 from the field and was nearly perfect from the free throw line, making 7-8 attempts. Wilkinson also added 1 assist and 1 block to his stat line. The collective efforts of Sayler, Mors, and Wilkinson helped propel the Jackrabbits to their 8-point win, with each player bringing a unique set of skills to the table to contribute to the team's success.
North Dakota's top performers were unable to propel their team to victory, despite putting up respectable numbers. Greyson Uelmen led the way with 19 points, but his 6-15 shooting from the field and 1-4 mark from beyond the arc were not enough to overcome the deficit. Garrett Anderson chipped in with 18 points and a team-high 7 rebounds, but his efforts were ultimately insufficient to change the outcome.
Eli King added 14 points off the bench, including 4-7 shooting from three-point range, but his impact was limited by his lack of involvement in other areas of the game, with only 1 rebound and 2 assists to his name. While these individual performances were solid, they were not enough to counter the balanced attack of South Dakota State, and North Dakota was ultimately forced to succumb to defeat.
Beyond the standout performances, the remainder of the players for both teams generally fell in line with their season averages.
CHD Scout Report Card
CORRECTPredicted
Final
The pre-game prediction of a South Dakota State victory by 9 points ultimately proved correct, albeit by a slightly narrower margin of 8 points. While the actual score of 91-83 was higher than anticipated, the Jackrabbits' winning margin was in line with expectations. This outcome suggests that the pre-game assessment of the teams' relative strengths was largely accurate, with South Dakota State's offense ultimately proving too potent for North Dakota to overcome.
A closer examination of the team statistics reveals that the game was decided by South Dakota State's ability to dominate the glass and shoot efficiently from beyond the arc. The Jackrabbits' offensive rebounding rate of 43.3% was significantly higher than their season average, allowing them to capitalize on second-chance opportunities and maintain a high level of scoring intensity. Additionally, their 48.3% three-point shooting percentage was a key factor in their ability to outpace North Dakota's high-powered offense, which itself shot an impressive 62.5% effective field goal percentage. These two factors combined to give South Dakota State the edge they needed to secure the victory.
The outcome of this contest has significant implications for both teams' NCAA Tournament resumes, albeit in differing ways. For South Dakota State, the win, although a Quad 4 game, still adds a much-needed victory to their overall record, now standing at 13-16, and may help to slightly bolster their NET ranking of 206. However, their lack of success in Quad 1 and Quad 2 games, with a combined 0-7 record, will likely keep them on the periphery of the tournament bubble, potentially positioning them for a 16-seed if they can secure their conference's automatic bid. In contrast, North Dakota's loss, as a Quad 3 game, is a missed opportunity to bolster their own resume, and their 16-15 record, coupled with a NET ranking of 275, makes their at-large hopes extremely dim, with a potential conference tournament championship being their only viable path to the NCAA Tournament. Ultimately, South Dakota State's victory has merely delayed their inevitable march towards irrelevance, while North Dakota's defeat has all but sealed their fate as a tournament afterthought.