In a stunning turn of events, North Dakota pulled off a one-point upset over St. Thomas (FL) at the Denny Sanford Premier Center, winning 67-66. The University of North Dakota, ranked 283 in the NET rankings, managed to overcome a six-point halftime deficit to defeat the University of St. Thomas (FL), which came into the game ranked 105. The margin of victory was a single point, a testament to the closely contested nature of the game.
The half scores reveal that North Dakota outscored St. Thomas (FL) 39-32 in the second half, erasing the six-point deficit they faced at the break. This comeback has significant implications for the seed line, as North Dakota's upset win over a higher-ranked opponent will likely send shockwaves through the rankings. The fact that North Dakota was able to outscore St. Thomas (FL) in the second half suggests that they made key adjustments and were able to capitalize on their opportunities, ultimately leading to the upset victory.
A 28-point, 3-rebound performance from Greyson Uelmen set the tone for North Dakota, with Uelmen's 9-11 field goal shooting and 9-12 free throw shooting proving crucial in the one-point victory. His efficient scoring helped North Dakota stay ahead, and with Eli King contributing 17 points and 4 rebounds, the team's offense remained balanced. Erupting for 17 points, King also added 2 assists, showcasing his all-around skills.
The freshman standout Eli King's 3-6 three-point shooting was a key factor in North Dakota's win, as his outside scoring threat stretched the defense. With the game on the line, Greyson Uelmen's ability to get to the free-throw line and convert proved vital, and his 1 assist also demonstrated an ability to create for teammates. Garrett Anderson's 11 points, though not as prolific as Uelmen's, still provided a necessary secondary scoring option, and his 1 assist highlighted a team-oriented approach from Anderson.
Finishing with 23 points, 9 rebounds, and 3 assists, Nolan Minessale's performance was a bright spot for St. Thomas (FL), but ultimately not enough to secure a win. His 8-20 shooting from the field and 0-2 mark from beyond the arc were notable, as were his 7-10 free throws, which helped to keep his team in contention. Despite the loss, Minessale's overall stat line suggests he was a significant contributor, even if his efficiency could have been improved.
The team's supporting cast, however, was not able to match Minessale's output, with Ben Oosterbaan's 16 points on 8-12 shooting being a notable exception. His inability to connect from three-point range, going 0-3, was a limitation, but his overall field goal percentage was a positive. Nick Janowski, meanwhile, struggled to find his rhythm, finishing with 8 points on 3-12 shooting, including 2-7 from beyond the arc, and his 8 rebounds were not enough to offset his shooting woes.
Beyond the top performers, the remainder of the players for both teams largely adhered to their established season trends, with no notable outliers.
CHD Scout Report Card
INCORRECTPredicted
Final
The pre-game prediction, which favored St. Thomas (FL) by a significant margin, proved to be inaccurate as North Dakota emerged with a narrow victory. This outcome was unexpected, given the predicted 18-point difference, and highlights the unpredictability of college basketball. The actual result, a single-point win for North Dakota, suggests that the teams' performances deviated from their season averages in meaningful ways, contributing to the upset.
A closer examination of the team statistics reveals that North Dakota's superior shooting efficiency and St. Thomas (FL)'s uncharacteristic struggles from beyond the arc were pivotal factors in the outcome. North Dakota's effective field goal percentage of 58.0% was notably higher than their season average, while St. Thomas (FL)'s 16.7% three-point shooting was a significant departure from their usual accuracy. Additionally, St. Thomas (FL)'s unusually high offensive rebounding rate, which exceeded their season average by a substantial margin, was not enough to offset their shooting woes, ultimately contributing to their loss. These factors combined to give North Dakota the edge they needed to secure the win.
The outcome of this contest has significant implications for both teams' postseason aspirations, as they each vie for the SUMM conference tournament auto-bid. For North Dakota, the win bolsters their conference tournament positioning, potentially improving their seeding and path to the championship game. Conversely, St. Thomas (FL)'s loss may hinder their chances of securing a favorable seed, forcing them to navigate a more treacherous bracket. In the context of their program trajectories, North Dakota's victory suggests they are trending upward, having capitalized on a Quad 3 opportunity, while St. Thomas (FL)'s defeat in a Quad 4 game raises questions about their ability to perform under pressure. Ultimately, this result underscores the reality that, for both teams, the only path to the NCAA Tournament is through the conference tournament, and North Dakota's win has given them a crucial edge in that pursuit, making it clear that their season's fate will be decided by their ability to navigate the SUMM tournament, not their regular season record.