The Idaho State Bengals, ranked 238 in the NET rankings, secured a hard-fought 73-65 victory over the Northern Arizona Lumberjacks, who sit at 312 in the NET rankings, at Idaho Central Arena. The eight-point margin of victory belies the competitiveness of the contest, as the Bengals' 15-point halftime lead was gradually chipped away by the Lumberjacks in the second half. Idaho State's strong first-half performance, where they outscored NAU 45-30, ultimately proved to be the difference-maker.
The second-half surge by NAU, where they outscored ISU 35-28, was not enough to overcome the deficit. The Bengals' ability to maintain their lead, despite being outscored in the second half, was a key factor in their victory. The final score suggests that the outcome was decided by a possession or two, with the Bengals' first-half advantage proving to be the decisive factor in the end.
A 17-point, 13-rebound effort from Connor Hollenbeck set the tone for Idaho State, as his versatility on the court proved crucial in the team's victory. His ability to score from both inside and outside the arc, going 2-2 from three-point range, was a key factor in the team's success. With the game on the line, Hollenbeck's four assists also helped to facilitate scoring opportunities for his teammates.
The freshman standout, Louis Bond, chipped in with 13 points and eight rebounds, providing a much-needed secondary scoring option for Idaho State. Erupting for 13 points on 6-13 shooting from the field, Bond's performance helped to take pressure off Hollenbeck and the rest of the team. In contrast, Caleb Van De Griend's nine points, although fewer than his teammates, still contributed to the team's overall scoring effort, with his five rebounds also making an impact on the glass.
Despite the loss, Traivar Jackson's performance was a notable aspect of Northern Arizona's effort, with his 19 points on 8-12 shooting from the field serving as a highlight. Finishing with 19 points, Jackson also contributed 8 rebounds, but it ultimately wasn't enough to propel his team to victory. The team's leading scorer, Jackson, also added a block to his stat line, showcasing his versatility on the court.
Diego Campisano's 14 points, which came on 4-10 shooting from the field, were a significant contribution to Northern Arizona's offense, but his efforts were ultimately overshadowed by Idaho State's strong team performance. His 3 assists and 4 rebounds were also notable, but Campisano's 2-6 shooting from beyond the arc was a reminder that even the team's top performers were not immune to struggles on the night. Isaiah Shaw's 9 points, which included 2 blocks, were a quiet but effective contribution, but his overall impact was limited by the team's inability to contain Idaho State's offense.
Beyond the standout performances, the remaining players on both teams largely adhered to their established season trends.
CHD Scout Report Card
CORRECTPredicted
Final
The pre-game prediction of an Idaho State victory by nearly seven points ultimately proved correct, with the team emerging victorious by eight. While the margin was slightly wider than anticipated, the outcome itself was not a surprise. This alignment of expectation and reality suggests that the underlying factors that were expected to influence the game did indeed play out as anticipated. The actual result, however, was shaped by a few key factors that tipped the balance in Idaho State's favor.
A closer examination of the team statistics reveals that Idaho State's ability to control the boards and convert from beyond the arc were pivotal in securing their victory. The team's offensive rebounding rate of 50.0% was significantly higher than their season average, indicating a concerted effort to dominate the paint and limit Northern Arizona's second-chance opportunities. Furthermore, Idaho State's three-point shooting, which exceeded their season average, allowed them to stretch the defense and create scoring opportunities that Northern Arizona struggled to match, particularly given their own subpar three-point performance. These factors, combined with the teams' similar effective field goal percentages, ultimately decided the outcome of the game.
The outcome of this contest has significant implications for both teams' postseason aspirations, as they each vie for the Big Sky conference tournament auto-bid. Idaho State's victory propels them forward in the conference standings, bolstering their chances of securing a favorable seed in the tournament, while Northern Arizona's loss further complicates their path to the championship. With both teams boasting unimpressive records against higher-tier opponents, their Quad 4 matchup served as a crucial opportunity to gain traction, and Idaho State capitalized to improve to 13-19. As the season draws to a close, the trajectory of these programs will be defined by their ability to navigate the conference tournament, and Idaho State's win has given them a vital boost, making it clear that in the Big Sky, even the most modest of wins can have a profound impact on a team's fortunes.