The Miami University (Ohio) RedHawks secured a 90-74 win over the Ohio Bobcats, improving their record to 25-0. Brant Byers led the charge with 21 points and 6 rebounds, while Peter Suder added 20 points and 6 rebounds. The RedHawks' 25-0 start is a reflection of their strong team performance, with 47 points scored in the second half. The Ohio Bobcats, on the other hand, fell to 13-13, with Jackson Paveletzke scoring 22 points in the losing effort.
Brant Byers Scores 21 Points, Leads Miami University (Ohio) to 25-0 Record
The game unfolded with Miami University (Ohio) taking an early lead, scoring 43 points in the first half. The Ohio Bobcats trailed by 8 points at halftime, with a score of 43-35. In the second half, Miami University (Ohio) continued to dominate, scoring 47 points and limiting Ohio to 39 points. The RedHawks' strong team defense held Ohio to 39.3% shooting from the field, while they themselves shot 51.7% from the field. The 16-point margin of victory was slightly lower than the predicted 20.1 points, but still a convincing win for Miami University (Ohio). The RedHawks' 25-0 record is a notable achievement, with their NET ranking of 51 reflecting their strong performance.
The top performers for Miami University (Ohio) were Brant Byers, with 21 points and 6 rebounds, and Peter Suder, with 20 points and 6 rebounds. Eian Elmer added 15 points to the RedHawks' total. For the Ohio Bobcats, Jackson Paveletzke led the way with 22 points, while Javan Simmons scored 12 points and JJ Kelly added 8 points. The performance of Brant Byers and Jackson Paveletzke was notable, with both players scoring over 20 points. The RedHawks' balanced attack was evident, with three players scoring in double figures.
CHD Scout Report Card
CORRECTPredicted
Final
The key statistics from the game include Miami University (Ohio)'s 51.7% field goal percentage, compared to Ohio's 39.3%. The RedHawks also outrebounded the Bobcats 36-29, with Brant Byers and Peter Suder each grabbing 6 rebounds. The Ohio Bobcats committed 12 turnovers, while Miami University (Ohio) had 10 turnovers. The RedHawks' strong shooting and rebounding were key factors in their 16-point victory. The game saw a total of 164 points scored, with Miami University (Ohio) scoring 90 points and Ohio scoring 74 points.
The CHD Scout prediction model correctly predicted a Miami University (Ohio) win, with a predicted margin of 20.1 points. The actual margin of 16 points was slightly lower, but still a convincing win for the RedHawks. The model's prediction of a 90-70 score was close to the actual score of 90-74. The correct prediction is a reflection of the model's accuracy, with Miami University (Ohio)'s strong performance reflecting their high NET ranking of 51.
The win for Miami University (Ohio) was a Quadrant 4 game, while the loss for Ohio was a Quadrant 1 game. The RedHawks' NET ranking of 51 reflects their strong performance, with their 25-0 record a notable achievement. The Ohio Bobcats' NET ranking of 213 is a reflection of their inconsistent performance, with their 13-13 record a reflection of their struggles. The game had real consequences for both teams, with Miami University (Ohio) solidifying their position as a top team and Ohio looking to improve their resume.
The Miami University (Ohio) RedHawks want to continue their winning streak in their next game, while the Ohio Bobcats will aim to bounce back from their loss. The RedHawks' next game is scheduled for February 17, against the Kent State Golden Flashes. The Bobcats' next game is scheduled for February 18, against the Buffalo Bulls. Both teams want to improve their records and strengthen their resumes.