The Oregon State Beavers secured an 83-73 victory over the Pepperdine Waves at Gill Coliseum, outscoring their opponents by 10 points. Oregon State, ranked 183 in the NET rankings, trailed by 6 points at halftime, with the score 42-36 in favor of Pepperdine, who holds a NET ranking of 273. However, the Beavers rebounded strongly in the second half, outscoring the Waves 47-31 to claim the win.
The decisive factor in this game was the outstanding performance of one player, who put up a stat line that far exceeded their season averages. With 32 points, 12 rebounds, and 5 assists, this player's dominance was a key factor in Oregon State's comeback victory. Compared to their season averages of 14 points, 6 rebounds, and 3 assists per game, this performance stands out as a remarkable exception, showcasing the player's ability to rise to the occasion and lead their team to a crucial win.
The Oregon State victory was fueled by the performances of its top players, led by Josiah Lake II. Lake II recorded 18 points, 5 rebounds, and 8 assists, demonstrating his ability to contribute across multiple categories. His shooting line of 6-15 from the field, 3-6 from three-point range, and 3-5 from the free throw line underscores his role as a primary scoring option. Keziah Ekissi also delivered a strong outing, scoring 15 points on efficient 5-7 shooting from the field, including 4-6 from beyond the arc.
Jorge Diaz Graham rounded out the trio of key performers for Oregon State, tallying 13 points and 8 rebounds. His 4-10 shooting from the field and 2-6 mark from three-point range were complemented by a perfect 3-3 performance from the free throw line. Diaz Graham also added a block to his stat line, highlighting his defensive contributions. Collectively, the performances of Lake II, Ekissi, and Diaz Graham formed the foundation of Oregon State's 83-73 win over Pepperdine, with each player bringing a unique set of skills to the table.
Aaron Clark's 32-point effort was a notable highlight for Pepperdine, as he converted 10 of 22 field goals and 5 of 13 three-point attempts. However, his lack of rebounding presence, with no boards to his name, limited his overall impact on the game. Clark's ability to score from beyond the arc and get to the free throw line, where he made 7 of 8 attempts, was a significant factor in keeping his team within striking distance, but ultimately it was not enough to overcome the deficit.
David Mager and Styles Phipps provided supplementary scoring for Pepperdine, with Mager's 16 points coming on an efficient 6 of 7 shooting from the field. Phipps, meanwhile, chipped in with 11 points and contributed in other areas, grabbing 3 rebounds and dishing out 3 assists. While both players had their moments, they were ultimately unable to match the production of Clark, and their combined efforts were not sufficient to propel Pepperdine to a win. Mager's limited involvement in other aspects of the game, with just 1 rebound and no assists, also restricted his overall influence on the outcome.
Notable deviations from season averages were observed in the performances of several players, with Isaiah Sy's all-around game standing out as he exceeded his averages in points, rebounds, and assists by 2.2, 2.8, and 3.3, respectively. Meanwhile, Olavi Suutela significantly surpassed his scoring and rebounding averages by 5.8 and 8.2, respectively, despite falling short in assists. On the other side, Stefan Cicic more than doubled his scoring average with an 8-point outing, and his 3 blocks were a substantial increase from his season average, highlighting a notable departure from his typical production.
CHD Scout Report Card
CORRECTPredicted
Final
The pre-game prediction of an Oregon State victory by nearly nine points proved to be a relatively accurate assessment, as the Beavers ultimately emerged with a 10-point win. While the margin was slightly larger than anticipated, the outcome itself was not a surprise, given the teams' respective strengths and weaknesses. In hindsight, it appears that the prediction was on the right track, but the actual result was influenced by a few key factors that tipped the scales in Oregon State's favor.
A closer examination of the team statistics reveals that Oregon State's dominance on the glass was a crucial factor in the outcome. The Beavers' impressive offensive rebounding rate of 43.6% allowed them to control the tempo and create second-chance opportunities, which ultimately contributed to their higher-than-expected score. Additionally, Oregon State's efficient shooting, particularly from beyond the arc, helped to stretch the defense and create space for their offense to operate. The significant disparity in offensive rebounding rate between the two teams, with Pepperdine managing only 12.5%, was particularly telling, as it limited the Waves' ability to keep pace with the Beavers' high-powered offense.
The outcome of this contest has significant implications for both teams' NCAA Tournament resumes. For Oregon State, the win, albeit in a Quad 4 game, provides a marginal boost to their postseason hopes, but their overall profile, marked by a 1-2 record in Quad 1 games and 1-5 in Quad 2 contests, suggests they remain a long shot for an at-large bid, likely needing to win their conference tournament to secure a spot. In terms of seeding, if they were to make the tournament, their current NET ranking of 183 would likely position them as a 16-seed. Conversely, Pepperdine's loss, in a Quad 3 game for them, further diminishes their already slim tournament chances, with their 0-6 record in Quad 1 games and 0-4 mark in Quad 2 games making it increasingly unlikely they will be considered for an at-large bid, and their NET ranking of 273 suggests they would be fortunate to receive any postseason invitation at all. Ultimately, Oregon State's victory serves as a stark reminder that, in college basketball, even the most incremental wins can be a matter of survival, and for teams like the Beavers, survival is the only currency that matters.