In a stunning turn of events, Prairie View A&M, ranked 316 in the NET rankings, pulled off a significant upset against Southern, ranked 277, with a 72-66 victory. The six-point margin belies the extent of the underdog's dominance, particularly in the first half, where Prairie View A&M established a 13-point lead. This outcome has significant implications for seed line projections and is a testament to the unpredictability of college basketball.
The final score and half scores reveal a tale of two halves, with PVAM taking control early and Southern attempting to mount a comeback in the second half. Despite being outscored 38-31 after halftime, PVAM's strong first-half performance proved sufficient to secure the win. The upset has noteworthy repercussions, considering the NET rankings disparity between the two teams, and raises questions about the teams' relative strengths and weaknesses.
A 29-point, 10-rebound performance was not achieved by any player, but Lance Williams's 18 points, complemented by 4 rebounds and 5 assists, helped guide Prairie View A&M to victory. With the game on the line, his efficiency from the field, shooting 7-9, proved crucial in securing the win. Erupting for 16 points, Cory Wells also made significant contributions, adding 6 rebounds and 3 blocks to his stat line, while shooting 6-15 from the field.
The freshman standout, Dontae Horne, chipped in with 15 points, 3 rebounds, and 5 assists, playing a key role in Prairie View A&M's success. His 6-20 shooting from the field and 2-5 from three-point range indicate areas for improvement, but his overall performance was a positive factor in the outcome. As the team's victory was fueled by these top performers, Lance Williams's 2-2 shooting from three-point range and Cory Wells's 2-2 shooting from the free throw line were notable highlights, demonstrating their ability to deliver under pressure.
His 19 points on 7-17 shooting from Michael Jacobs wasn't enough to keep Southern in it, as the team ultimately fell short. The team's leading scorer, Jacobs, also contributed 9 assists, but his efforts were not sufficient to overcome the deficit. Finishing with 18 points and 10 rebounds, AJ Barnes had a notable performance, but it was not quite enough to propel Southern to victory.
Despite the loss, Barnes' double-double, which included 1 block, was a highlight for Southern, and his 6-12 shooting from the field was a bright spot in an otherwise disappointing outing. Cam Amboree's 10 points on 4-12 shooting were a modest contribution, and his 1 block was not enough to make a significant impact on the game's outcome. With 2-6 three-point shooting, Amboree struggled to find his range, and his overall performance was shut down by Prairie View A&M's defense.
A notable deviation from season averages was seen in the performance of Southern's supporting cast, with Terrance Dixon Jr.'s rebounding numbers standing out, as his 9 rebounds exceeded his season average by 4.5, while his scoring output fell 2.3 points short of his typical mark, with Terrance Dixon Jr. managing only 7 points on the night.
CHD Scout Report Card
CORRECTPredicted
Final
The pre-game prediction, which favored Prairie View A&M by nearly 3 points, ultimately proved correct, albeit with a slightly wider margin of victory than anticipated. The actual result, a 6-point win for Prairie View A&M, suggests that the prediction was generally on the right track, but perhaps underestimated the Panthers' ability to separate themselves from their opponents. This discrepancy may be attributed to various factors that unfolded during the game, which had a significant impact on the final outcome.
A closer examination of the team statistics reveals that the game was decided by Prairie View A&M's superior shooting efficiency and Southern's struggles from beyond the arc. The Panthers' effective field goal percentage of 52.5% was a notable improvement from their season average, allowing them to maintain a consistent scoring pace throughout the game. In contrast, Southern's 3-point shooting woes, which saw them convert just 26.3% of their attempts, hindered their ability to keep pace with Prairie View A&M's offense. Additionally, while Southern did manage to secure a higher percentage of offensive rebounds than their season average, it was not enough to offset their shooting struggles, ultimately contributing to the decisive margin in favor of Prairie View A&M.
The outcome of this contest has significant implications for both teams' postseason aspirations, as they both rely on securing the SWAC conference tournament auto-bid to advance to the NCAA Tournament. For Prairie View A&M, the win bolsters their position within the conference standings, potentially setting them up for a more favorable seeding in the upcoming tournament. In contrast, Southern's loss may force them to navigate a more challenging path, potentially facing tougher opponents earlier in the tournament. Given the relatively weak schedules of both teams, with this matchup being a Quad 4 game for both, it is clear that their postseason trajectories will be largely defined by their performance within the conference. As the regular season draws to a close, it is evident that Prairie View A&M's program trajectory is trending upward, while Southern's campaign is on shaky ground, and the fact that the Panthers were able to capitalize on this win will only add to the pressure on the Jaguars to rebound and make a deep run in the conference tournament.