The Purdue Boilermakers delivered a resounding 78-57 victory over the Iowa Hawkeyes, led by a balanced attack that saw three players score in double figures, including Gicarri Harris with 14 points and 5 rebounds. Bennett Stirtz was the top performer for Iowa, scoring 19 points and grabbing 5 rebounds, but it wasn't enough to overcome the Boilermakers' 21-point margin of victory. Purdue's 78 points were fueled by a strong first half, where they outscored Iowa 36-25.
Trey Kaufman-Renn's 12 Rebounds Lead Purdue to Dominant Win
The game unfolded with Purdue taking control from the start, building a 36-25 lead by halftime. The Boilermakers' offense was clicking, with 42 points in the second half to seal the 21-point win. Iowa struggled to keep pace, scoring just 32 points in the second half. The Hawkeyes' Bennett Stirtz had a strong game, but his 19 points were not enough to overcome the balanced attack of Purdue, which saw Gicarri Harris, C.J. Cox, and Trey Kaufman-Renn all score in double figures. Purdue's 12 rebounds from Trey Kaufman-Renn were a key factor in their dominance, outrebounding Iowa 40-33.
The top performers for both teams were impressive, with Bennett Stirtz leading Iowa with 19 points and 5 rebounds. Gicarri Harris was the top performer for Purdue, scoring 14 points and grabbing 5 rebounds. C.J. Cox also had a strong game for the Boilermakers, scoring 14 points, while Trey Kaufman-Renn added 12 points and 12 rebounds. For Iowa, Tavion Banks chipped in with 9 points and 5 rebounds, and Cam Manyawu had 8 points and 8 rebounds. The balanced attack of Purdue was too much for Iowa to handle, with the Boilermakers' three double-figure scorers outpacing Iowa's single double-figure scorer.
CHD Scout Report Card
INCORRECTPredicted
Final
The box score reveals a dominant performance by Purdue, with a 21-point margin of victory and a 40-33 rebounding advantage. The Boilermakers shot 51.9% from the field, while Iowa struggled to 38.5%. Purdue's 12 turnovers were fewer than Iowa's 15, and the Boilermakers' 42 points in the second half were more than Iowa's 32. The 14 points from Gicarri Harris and C.J. Cox were key to Purdue's victory, and Trey Kaufman-Renn's 12 rebounds were a major factor in their rebounding advantage.
The CHD Scout prediction model was incorrect, predicting an Iowa victory by 2.2 points. Instead, Purdue dominated the game, winning by 21 points. The predicted score of 75-72 was far off from the actual 78-57 final. The model missed the strong performance of Purdue's balanced attack, which proved too much for Iowa to handle. The 21-point margin of victory was a surprise, given the predicted close game. Purdue's 78 points were 3 more than the predicted 75, and Iowa's 57 points were 15 fewer than the predicted 72.
This game was a Quad 1 matchup for both teams, with real consequences for their NCAA tournament resumes. Purdue's win improves their NET ranking to 10, while Iowa's loss drops them to 26. The 21-point margin of victory is a strong statement for Purdue, who now have a 21-4 record. Iowa's 18-7 record takes a hit with the loss, but they remain a strong contender in the conference. The Quad 1 win for Purdue is a major boost to their tournament chances, and the loss for Iowa is a setback, but not a devastating one. Purdue's 21-4 record is impressive, with 12 of those wins coming against Quad 1 or Quad 2 opponents.
Purdue's next game is against the Michigan State Spartans on February 18, while Iowa faces the Ohio State Buckeyes on February 17. Both games matters in determining the conference standings and NCAA tournament seeding. Purdue want to build on their momentum from this win, while Iowa will try to bounce back from the loss. The 21-point margin of victory gives Purdue confidence heading into their next game, and Iowa must regroup and refocus to get back on track.