In a stunning upset, South Alabama, ranked 185 in the NET rankings, took down Troy, ranked 135, by a margin of 11 points, 65-54, at the Mitchell Center. The University of South Alabama Jaguars' victory over the Troy University Trojans has significant implications for seed line projections, as it upends expectations in the conference standings. Given the disparity in NET rankings, this result is particularly noteworthy, and a closer examination of the team statistics reveals how South Alabama managed to pull off the surprise win.
The halftime score, with South Alabama leading Troy 33-26, suggested that the Jaguars were in control from the outset. The second half saw South Alabama maintain its advantage, outscoring Troy 32-28 to secure the 11-point victory. The margin and half scores indicate that South Alabama's performance was consistent throughout the game, rather than being the result of a single scoring run or momentum shift. As the lower-ranked team, South Alabama's ability to dictate the pace and outperform its opponent is a testament to its resilience and strategic approach, and further analysis of the game statistics will be necessary to fully understand the factors that contributed to this upset.
Chaze Harris and Jayden Cooper led the way for South Alabama, each scoring 17 points in the team's 65-54 victory over Troy. Harris added 6 rebounds, 5 assists, and a block to his stat line, while shooting 8-15 from the field and 1-4 from the free throw line. Cooper, on the other hand, grabbed 5 rebounds and dished out 1 assist, but struggled with his three-point shot, going 2-9 from beyond the arc.
Adam Olsen also had a notable performance, scoring 16 points and pulling down 7 rebounds. He shot 5-9 from the field and 3-7 from three-point range, and was perfect from the free throw line, going 3-3. Olsen's outside shooting helped to stretch the defense and create opportunities for his teammates. The balanced attack from these three players was a key factor in South Alabama's win, as they accounted for a significant portion of the team's scoring.
Cooper Campbell led the way for Troy, scoring 26 points on 8-19 shooting from the field. While his scoring output was a notable bright spot, it ultimately was not enough to propel his team to victory. Campbell's reliance on three-point shooting was evident, as he attempted 17 shots from beyond the arc, making 7 of them. Despite his strong scoring performance, Campbell's lack of contributions in other areas, including rebounds and assists, limited his overall impact on the game.
Thomas Dowd and Victor Valdes struggled to find their footing against South Alabama's defense. Dowd managed just 10 points on 2-10 shooting, although he did contribute 8 rebounds and 2 blocks. Valdes scored 7 points, but made just 1 of his 6 field goal attempts, and was unable to stretch the defense with his outside shot, missing both of his three-point attempts. While both players showed flashes of their abilities, they were largely shut down by South Alabama's defensive efforts, and were unable to provide the necessary support to Campbell's scoring output.
Notable deviations from season averages were observed in the performances of Hantz Louis-Jeune, Stephen Williams, and Jerrell Bellamy. Louis-Jeune's 11 points exceeded his season average by 7.1 points, a significant increase, while his rebounding and assist numbers were relatively in line with his norms. In contrast, Stephen Williams' scoring output was 3.7 points below his average, although he did block three shots, more than doubling his season average. Jerrell Bellamy's rebounding total of nine was six above his average, but his scoring was 1.4 points shy of his typical output, highlighting an unusual distribution of contributions from these players in this game.
CHD Scout Report Card
INCORRECTPredicted
Final
The pre-game prediction, which narrowly favored Troy by 1.3 points, ultimately proved incorrect as South Alabama emerged victorious by 11 points. This discrepancy suggests that the prediction model underestimated the home team's ability to capitalize on their strengths and exploit Troy's weaknesses. The actual result, a decisive 11-point win for South Alabama, indicates that the prediction missed a significant aspect of the matchup, which ultimately led to the incorrect forecast.
A closer examination of the team statistics reveals that the decisive factors in this game were South Alabama's efficient field goal shooting and Troy's struggles in the same area. South Alabama's effective field goal percentage of 50.9% allowed them to maintain a consistent scoring pace, while Troy's 34.0% eFG% hindered their ability to keep up. Additionally, South Alabama's ability to limit their own offensive rebounding opportunities, while still outperforming their season average, suggests that they were able to balance their offense and defense effectively, ultimately leading to their 11-point victory.
The outcome of this contest has significant implications for both teams' NCAA Tournament resumes, with South Alabama's victory potentially bolstering their at-large hopes, albeit marginally, given the Quad 3 designation of this matchup. A 20-9 record and NET ranking of 185 may still leave them on the periphery of the bubble, but it keeps their postseason aspirations alive, potentially positioning them for a double-digit seed if they can accumulate a few more wins. In contrast, Troy's loss may have more pronounced seeding implications, as their 18-11 record and NET ranking of 135, coupled with their strong showings in Quad 1 and Quad 2 games, suggest they may still be in line for a single-digit seed, but this defeat could drop them to a 7 or 8 seed, underscoring the importance of their remaining games. Ultimately, South Alabama's win serves as a stark reminder that, in the cutthroat world of college basketball, a single misstep can be the difference between a favorable tournament draw and a daunting opening-round matchup.