The University of Tulsa established control early, taking a 45-29 lead into halftime against Tulane University. This 16-point advantage would prove to be a significant gap, as Tulsa maintained its dominance throughout the second half. The margin between the two teams only grew, with Tulsa ultimately securing a 90-56 victory over Tulane.
The final score reflects a 34-point difference, highlighting the considerable disparity between the two squads. With Tulsa ranked 55th in the NET rankings and Tulane at 184th, the outcome is not entirely surprising. The second half saw Tulane score 27 points, matched by Tulsa's 45, a scoring pace that mirrored the first half and further cemented Tulsa's substantial lead. The result underscores the gap in performance between these two teams, with Tulsa's superiority evident from the outset.
A 29-point performance was not to be found, but the next best thing was David Green's 19 points, which came on an efficient 8-12 shooting from the field, including 3-5 from beyond the arc. His 5 rebounds and 4 assists rounded out a well-rounded stat line. With the game firmly in hand, Ade Popoola's 16 points, which included 3-5 shooting from three-point range and a perfect 5-5 mark from the free throw line, helped Tulsa maintain its sizable lead.
The freshman standout Tylen Riley's 15 points and 8 assists were notable, as he effectively distributed the ball to his teammates while also scoring efficiently, going 7-11 from the field. Erupting for a strong all-around performance, his 3 rebounds were a testament to his activity on the court. His ability to balance scoring and playmaking was a key factor in Tulsa's dominant victory, as evidenced by the final 90-56 score.
Finishing with 16 points, 5 rebounds, and 1 block, Curtis Williams Jr.'s effort was a notable aspect of Tulane's offense, but it ultimately fell short. His 7-12 shooting from the field, including 2-5 from beyond the arc, was a bright spot in an otherwise difficult game for the team. Despite the loss, Asher Woods' 14 points, 4 rebounds, and 1 assist were a testament to his ability to contribute in multiple facets, with his 5-6 mark from the free throw line being a particularly impressive aspect of his performance.
The team's leading scorer, Curtis Williams Jr., received some support from Rowan Brumbaugh, who managed 7 points, 2 rebounds, and 5 assists, but his 2-7 shooting from the field and 1-3 mark from three-point range indicated that he was effectively shut down by Tulsa's defense. With his 2-3 mark from the free throw line being one of the few positives, Rowan Brumbaugh's overall performance was hindered by the opposing team's defensive efforts, limiting his ability to make a more significant impact on the game.
Beyond the standout performances, the remainder of the players for both Tulsa and Tulane largely conformed to their established season trends.
CHD Scout Report Card
CORRECTPredicted
Final
The pre-game prediction of a Tulsa victory by nearly 10 points proved to be a conservative estimate, as the Golden Hurricane ultimately emerged with a 34-point triumph. While the prediction correctly identified the winner, it failed to account for the magnitude of Tulsa's dominance. This disparity between the predicted and actual margins suggests that Tulane's performance was significantly worse than expected, while Tulsa exceeded its own projections.
A closer examination of the team statistics reveals that Tulsa's superior shooting and rebounding were the primary factors in its decisive victory. The Golden Hurricane's effective field goal percentage of 60.0% and three-point shooting percentage of 43.8% indicate a high level of efficiency on offense, allowing them to capitalize on their scoring opportunities. Furthermore, Tulsa's impressive offensive rebounding rate of 37.9% enabled the team to extend possessions and limit Tulane's chances for transition baskets, ultimately contributing to the significant disparity in the final score.
The outcome of this game has significant implications for both teams' postseason aspirations. For Tulsa, the win bolsters their NCAA Tournament resume, albeit marginally, as they remain on the bubble with a NET ranking of 55. The victory, classified as a Quad 3 win for the Golden Hurricane, does little to enhance their quad-based profile, which still features a lackluster 0-1 mark against Quad 1 opponents and a middling 3-3 record against Quad 2 foes. Conversely, Tulane's loss further diminishes their already faint hopes of securing an at-large bid, rendering their only viable path to the NCAA Tournament a conference tournament championship. As the Green Wave's NET ranking of 184 underscores their long-shot status, Tulsa's ability to navigate the remainder of their schedule without significant missteps will be crucial in determining their postseason fate. Ultimately, Tulsa's tournament prospects will be defined by their capacity to capitalize on upcoming opportunities, rather than simply accumulating wins against inferior opponents.