The Weber State Wildcats secured an 83-73 victory over the Idaho State Bengals at Reed Gym, outpacing their opponents by a margin of 10 points. This outcome was largely influenced by a first-half performance in which Weber State held a six-point advantage, leading 38-32 at the break. Idaho State, ranked 220 in the NET rankings, struggled to close the gap in the second half, as Weber State maintained a narrow edge, outscoring them 45-41.
The difference between the two teams, separated by 26 spots in the NET rankings, with Weber State sitting at 194, ultimately came down to a possession or two. The Bengals were unable to overcome the deficit established in the first half, and despite a competitive second-half performance, they were unable to bridge the gap. The Wildcats' ability to maintain their lead throughout the game proved to be the decisive factor, resulting in a 10-point victory.
A 29-point, 10-rebound performance from Tijan Saine Jr. set the tone for Weber State's 83-73 victory over Idaho State. With the game on the line, Saine Jr. continued to assert his dominance, converting on crucial free throws down the stretch to seal the win. His 24 points on 8-15 shooting from the field and 2-7 from three-point range were pivotal in Weber State's success.
Erupting for 16 points, Viljami Vartiainen provided a spark off the bench, hitting 4 of 8 three-point attempts to help Weber State build a commanding lead. His 6 rebounds on the glass also proved valuable in the Wildcats' win. Meanwhile, Trevor Hennig's 13 points, including 1 of 4 from three-point range, helped to maintain Weber State's momentum throughout the contest, as the team's offense remained balanced and effective in the face of Idaho State's best efforts.
Despite the loss, Caleb Van De Griend's 15 points and 8 rebounds were not enough to propel Idaho State to a victory. His 6-of-12 shooting from the field was a respectable effort, but ultimately fell short. The team's leading scorer, however, struggled to find his rhythm, and his inability to make a significant impact on the game's outcome was a telling factor.
Finishing with 15 points, Connor Hollenbeck's shooting percentage was slightly higher than Van De Griend's, but his overall contribution was similarly underwhelming. Gus Etchison's 15 points were a bright spot for Idaho State, but his 1 rebound and 7 assists, although impressive, were overshadowed by his poor shooting. His 5-of-12 shooting from the field and 2-of-6 mark from beyond the arc limited his team's scoring opportunities and ultimately sealed their fate.
Weber State's normally reliable post play was stifled by an uncharacteristic shooting slump from center, Nigel Burris, who scored only 11 points, a full 0.8 points below his season average, and was held to just 50% from the field, a noticeable drop from his typical efficiency. The 4.0 additional rebounds Burris grabbed were a welcome surprise, but his otherwise subdued performance was a key factor in Weber State's inability to establish a dominant presence in the paint.
CHD Scout Report Card
CORRECTPredicted
Final
While the pre-game prediction of a 2.9-point Weber State victory ultimately proved correct, the final margin of 10 points suggests a more decisive outcome than anticipated. Upon closer examination, it's clear that Weber State's dominance on the glass and from beyond the arc were the primary factors in their convincing win.
The Wildcats' ability to secure a 30.0% rebounding rate, a slight improvement over their season average, allowed them to control the pace of the game and limit Idaho State's second-chance opportunities. Furthermore, Weber State's 40.0% three-point shooting performance, a season-high, also proved to be a significant factor, as it stretched the Bengals' defense and created openings for easier baskets inside. These two key areas of strength enabled the Wildcats to build a significant lead and ultimately cruise to a 10-point victory.
The victory for Weber State improves their standing within the Big Sky Conference, moving them one step closer to securing the conference tournament auto-bid. At 16-14, they remain in the mix for a top-four seed in the conference tournament, but their path to the championship is now more feasible. Conversely, Idaho State's loss further solidifies their position as a lower-seeded team in the conference tournament, likely relegating them to a first-round matchup. With this Quad 3 win, Weber State's program trajectory is trending upward, while Idaho State's season is slipping away, casting doubt on their ability to make a deep run in the conference tournament.